NEVEREST II New Insights: Inside Rob Hall's Adventure Consultants Expedition (Mountain Mania Book 3) By Nick van der Leek

NEVEREST II New insightsquared

Bolder narratives have recently emerged pointing the finger at Krakauer and even Rob Hall Do these new accusations hold water Do they expose new and even troubling questions What new information is revealed about the client climbers In NEVEREST II freelance photojournalist and amateur climber Nick van der Leek probes deep inside the Everest 96 canon The disturbing insights he gleans from research into the psychological fabric of client climbers and their behavior patterns reveals a new controversial context of indiscretions lurking just below the surface of the disaster In the end the essence of the question NEVEREST II answers is this what were the Adventure Consultants climbers doing while their teammates were dying only a few meters away If Lou Kasischke cared so much about the truth as much as we do why did he wait 16 years to tell his story If climbing is answering a call to adventure and embarking on a well worn route to heroism.

Pdf neverest ii new insights 2022

By the end of the 1996 season the deadliest in the history of Mount Everest 13 climbers in all had perished If it wasn t the weather and if it wasn t just the presence of journalists what else fatally compromised Rob Hall s team the Adventure Consultants Were they really on a winning wicket when things suddenly went south on summit day or was something else insidiously eating at the team s ability to perform all along If so what was it What was the actual psychology that drove a record number of strong brave men and a Japanese woman to certain death On May 10 two big teams were locked in a deadly rivalry but exactly what was the psychology of this rivalry on the level of the ordinary client climber This is the meat and potatoes of NEVEREST II How did three doctors a publisher and a lawyer gel with two blue collar workers and a Japanese woman What was the impact of the merge on summit day and of one American team ultimately winning the charge up the world s highest mountain Did the losing team also quickly lose morale including the urgency to take care of their teammates Did losing a leader leave a lethal leadership vacuum in its wake especially for a team that was used to following orders Two decades after the disaster mystery misperceptions and misrepresentations persist New NEVEREST II demonstrates how climbing Everest is also a highway exposing the charlatan and the coward NEVEREST II New Insights Inside Rob Hall s Adventure Consultants Expedition Mountain Mania Book 3 Just bad writingThis was hard to read not only because of all the mispelled words and bad grammar but because of the very personal attacks on the climbers The vehement hatred of one man because of his Christianity only tells us about the author of this book not the story of the climb 179 This is a hard book for me to review The reason I was hooked from the start and couldn t stop reading For me and my short attention span that usually earns the book an easy five stars This book series looks at the 96 Everest disaster from a true crime aspect and assigns different levels of blame to the various climbers I ve read numerous crime books by Van der Leek because I like the way he details the motivations of murderers That s why I was surprised that I didn t agree with any of his conclusions in this book. Neverest ii new insightsync Opinions are like buttholes and just as I support Van der Leek having his I have my own At the end of the first book which was critical of Krakauer he alluded to Kasichke another climber s perspective that would debunk Krakauer s version of events That turned out to be click bait This second book can be summed up this way Christianity bad Loving your wife bad I don t care if you criticize other people s beliefs that s free speech But when you repeat the same thing over and over and over and over and over and sarcastically mock others beliefs I start to think maybe this is a you problem I wanted to ask Van der Leek where on the doll the Christian hurt him Same with mocking the man s marriage Me thinks he doth protest too much Could it possibly be a bitter bachelor envious of others happiness Van der Leek portrays Kasichke as a loner miserable on the mountain and a slow and very poor climber Then in the second part of the book when things go sideways he skewers the guy for not helping to rescue others in the middle of a blizzard The main problem I have is this Whether Kasichke is a whiny incompetent or not he at least had the sense to turn around Too many other climbers lacked this sense Also a slow poor mountaineer should NOT be out in the middle of a blizzard trying to rescue people That s just creating victims who need to be rescued A pint can t be expected to hold a quart If it s holding a pint it s doing all that it can Could he have done something though Yes I think so He could have made tea for those freezing climbers who were rescued He could have been securing the tents and gathering sleeping bags and O2 bottles That s a fair criticism Van der Leek said all he did was pray and think about Sandy He could have gathered O2 and sleeping bags while praying and thinking of his wife. NEVEREST II New Insights ebooks free But the point of the book where my jaw hit the floor was this He s Kasichke worried about his wife and what she thinks than people his own teammates who are literally dying forty minutes from his position If this was a lone statement I d agree with it It s not It s a drumbeat Van der Leek s position is that every climber on Everest should be concerned with people he met less than six weeks ago than a spouse they vowed to love honor and cherish so long as they both shall live Not only is it absurd the facts don t bear it out Weathers and Kasichke who were thinking about their families managed to get off the mountain If Rob Hall had been concerned about his wife and unborn child than a man s deadly and unrealistic dream to reach the summit he d likely still be alive Same with Fischer If Fischer had let someone else take Kruse down maybe he wouldn t have gotten sick and died Second the teammates didn t rescue Weathers Weathers rescued himself spurred on by thoughts of his wife and family. Neverest ii new insightsync Van der Leek says if you can t climb without being a dick if you re not able to at least consider the lives of others in your team shouldn t climb Again if that s all he said on the subject I d agree My take is this If the only thing you care about is the people on the mountain and not loved ones off the mountain you are a dick and shouldn t be climbing. Book NEVEREST II New insights meaning Despite all this I will continue the series Like I said at the beginning I m very interested in the story 179 I was not impressed with this book I think I kept reading thinking that somewhere we would get to the new insights or that salacious piece of gossip that always seemed to be implied It just wasn t there I had already read Krakauer s Into Thin Air and Anatoli Boukreev s The Climb about the 1996 Everest season both of which I really enjoyed Van der Leek is particularly critical of Krakauer which I think is unwarranted I did not find Krakauer s book to be critical of Boukreev as implied by van der Leek I found Into Thin Air to be a fascinating account of what happened and Krakauer seemed to be genuinely surprised and somewhat depressed by the impact of high altitude on man s ability to think and function to the point of people just ignoring the plight of others and becoming all about survival of oneself I don t think that those of us who weren t there including van der Leek can sit back and make judgements about what the climbers did or didn t do because of the extreme conditions encountered Additionally the book was very poorly edited with many mistakes 179