Confirmation bias financial planning

Has destroyed itself in the long term The author reveals the role of the Federalist Society Much of this was in the news but some information was not This is an important read for everyone as we are going to live under this judiciary for the next thirty plus years This is an unfortunate situation as the judiciary is supposed to be neutral. Confirmation bias and echo chambers I read this as an audiobook downloaded from Audible The book is ten hours and fifteen minutes Fred Sanders does a good job narrating the book Sanders is an actor and longtime audiobook narrator 9780062862914 While the circus known as the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination process has passed.

Confirmation bias for kids

The man ultimately named to the seat so suddenly vacated by Antonin Scalia on that Holiday weekend in February 2016 The biggest winner was undoubtedly Donald Trump Trump almost certainly would not have won the presidency without that open court seat to entice Republican voters and keep them supporting him despite personal failings of the sort that were on vivid display in the now infamous Access Hollywood tape. Confirmation bias in decision making Dysfunctional government indeed Will anyone listen or care Perhaps the 2020 election will be the indication 9780062862914 Great book Goes behind the scenes to show and detail fights to get someone confirmed for the Supreme Court.

Confirmation bias criminal law

Bipartisan procedures have been erased across all three branches of government Confirmation BiasCarl Hulse is chief Washington correspondent for the New York Times and a veteran of than three decades of reporting in the capital He has also served as the Washington editor of The Times as well as the chief congressional correspondent Carl is a native of Illinois and a graduate of Illinois State University. Confirmation bias business Heard Hulse discussing his book on a podcast and found the discussion intriguing A good synopsis of the past few decades of judicial confirmations and the political battles that have got us where we are now Many instances that infuriated me from both sides of the aisle and reminded me that most of the current political one upmanship sounds like school children arguing over who did what first The book made it pretty clear that Trump s election was directly related to his list of potential court nominees for the Scalia vacancy. Confirmation bias how to avoid Even though it is relatively short it took a while to read because I became so angry at times I had to put the book down on occasion Still informative and does a good job of encapsulating the judicial landscape. Confirmation bias and fake news 9 10 9780062862914 This book is a page turner that kept me moving from page to page from start to finish Unfortunately.

Confirmation bias meaning

But the central characters in this intrigue are in Congress and the White House The outsized role of unelected partisan ideologues in the selection of and opposition to SCOTUS candidates is scary The seeming abandonment of decency and respect throughout the entire process is even troubling A scorched earth mentality has become pervasive. Confirmation bias hbr 5 for me.

Confirmation bias in the workplace examples

This book outlines how the Republicans systematically set out to take over the judiciary They did this with great discipline According to Hulse this started in 2008. Confirmation bias criminal law The book is well written and researched The author also interviewed numerous people as part of his research Hulse attempts at staying neutral or unbiased in presenting the information but in my opinion at times leans a bit to the right Hulse tells how Mitch McConnell as Senate Majority Leader set out his strategy for owning the Supreme Court after the death of Antonin Scalia But the takeover of all the federal judiciary was already underway Hulse tells how McConnell deliberately and systematically blocked all but a few of Obama s appointees to federal openings The author outlines exactly how rules and procedures were changed by both parties that have changed the Senate process forever He portrays a picture of how partisan the Senate has become and therefore the memory of this dramatic event lingers for many A wrestling match between a determined US president and segment of the Senate created the conflict but Carl Hulse seeks to delve a little deeper Exploring a history of recent Senate POTUS clashes over judicial nominations Hulse examines how partisan politics brought many nominations to a halting stop while others became a bloodbath between the Democrats and Republicans With the primary focus on events from the death of Justice Antonio Scalia through to the Kavanaugh nomination of 2018 Hulse explores how a cunning move by the Republican Senate Majority Leader paralyses the process for President Obama and turned the constitutional requirement of the Chief Executive to nominate members to the Court into a farce Offering a detailed explanation of all the players their moves and the history of Senate Judicial Committee hearings Hulse provides all the tools for the reader to judge for themselves if the politics surrounding federal nominations has been completely bastardized With poignant analysis and well documented narratives including little known facts about nomination approvals by the Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee Hulse provides the reader just what the title suggests the likely ever developing power play over some of the most important choices during a president s tenure Recommended to those who love all things political in the United States as well as the reader with a curiosity about the nomination process of judges. Confirmation bias pdf I have done some reading about the recent goings on with the Kavanaugh nomination and thought that I would have a panoramic exploration of events in recent history on the topic Carl Hulse does a masterful job offering the reader a detailed look at political stage play and the emerging view that the two main political parties in the US Senate are out to gouge one another in the eye Offering supported arguments and events in history the narrative is full of tidbits that the reader can use to explore of these numerous events From the stalling and refusing to vote on an Obama nominee to the quick selection by President Trump once he was sworn in through to the circus that was Brett Kavanaugh and his purported innocence the book delivers while embedded references to past events of a similar nature All power truly rests with US Supreme Court Justices making their selection not only paramount to a president but also help to push an agenda for decades Perhaps this is why there is blood whenever the nominee is controversial or the Senate split so closely that a vote cannot be assured Whatever it might be Hulse is the perfect author to pen such a tome as he appears to have all his facts in a row. Confirmation bias human evolution Kudos Mr Hulse for a riveting book that kept me wondering until the very end I will have to find of your writing to see what else you have to say Love hate the review An ever growing collection of others appears at Book for All Seasons a different sort of Book Challenge 9780062862914 Kindle edition I gave this 3. Confirmation bias hbr 5 stars US Senate was charged with among other responsibilities advice and consent on federal judges federal appeals judges and those on the Supreme Court hereafter SCOTUS They voted to confirm federal judges Before they needed a vote of 60 100 Senators total now they needed a simple majority of 51 to confirm the nominee This could result in the minority party in the Senate having tied hands Also the Vice President could break a tie vote in the Senate In theory the Senate Judiciary Committee JC sought a SCOTUS nominee s judicial philosophy record The JC voted yes no after their nominee interrogation to pass the nom ination to the full Senate for a vote yes no to confirm the SCOTUS nominee In reality the SCOTUS nominee was askedpartisan questions by JC was he she pro or con on voting abortion gay environmental gun ownership etc rights GOP Senators seemed especially interested in federal de regulation Federal de regulation contributed in part to the US financial meltdown in 2008 which spread worldwide Huse discussed nominee controversies Bork Thomas Garland and Kavannah Many US Presidents naively thought a conservative nominee would vote conservatively or along party linesonce on the SCOTUS Chief Justice John Roberts twice voted to defend Obamacare The Affordable Care Act in SCOTUS and 2x the GOP castigated him for it Both political parties conveniently forgot a judge was intended to be impartial Democrats and Republicans acted partisan and childish RE the nomination process If a federal court nomineelived in Arizona or other state the 2 US Senators inthat state were asked to complete a blue slip to vouch for the judicial nominee Some refused to do it or ignored the blue lip Seldom a nominee was brought to a vote if both Senators rejected him her The author discussed filibusters of nominees and how those rules changed Interesting All federal judges except SCOTUS have a code of ethics 9780062862914 Fascinating frightening and a warning that unfortunately few will head I saw Carl Hulse speak at the National Council for the Social Studies conference in Austin TX about this book As he himself says Mitch McConnell praises this book and somehow fails to see it as the stinging rebuke of how polarized and partisan our government has become that it is Most likely because McConnell sees this as a good thing Hulse writes Under current rules and at the current levels of vitriol and distrust a future president of one party could easily be thwarted from getting essential nominees through a Senate controlled by the other With both parties responding to their political bases voting against the nominee of a president from the opposing party has become the norm rather than the rare occurrence It is a prescription for a badly dysfunctional government That is the collateral damage that is going to flow over time from abandoning the sixty vote requirement Senator Lindsey Graham told his Democratic colleagues Right now we don t need any of you all and there will come a day when you don t need any of us Judges are going to be ideological because you don t have to reach across the aisle to get anybody s input and it is going to have an effect over time on the judiciary that I very much regret But the larger point Hulse leaves for the end McConnell will forever be credited by Republicans and criticized by Democrats for his resistance to Obama that culminated with the obstruction of Supreme Court Nominee Merrick Garland for nearly a year But the biggest beneficiary of that effort was not McConnell or even Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch that few Americans understand 9780062862914

Confirmation Bias By Carl Hulse

006286291X

9780062862914

English

320

Hardcover

confirmation bias meaning

confirmation biases examples

confirmation bias bias

confirmation biases critical thinking quizlet

books on confirmation bias

confirmation bias pdf

confirmation bias ppt

confirmation bias definition

confirmation bias for kids

confirmation bias for dummies

confirmation bias definition psychology

confirmation bias synonym

confirmation bias simple definition

confirmation bias social work

confirmation bias real life examples

Entertaining and shrewd. Confirmation bias bubble Hulse is an expert guide through the machinations on Capitol Hill New York Times Book Review The Chief Washington Correspondent for the New York Times presents a richly detailed news breaking and conversation changing look at the unprecedented political fight to fill the Supreme Court seat made vacant by Antonin Scalia s death using it to explain the paralyzing and all but irreversible dysfunction across all three branches in the nation s capital The embodiment of American conservative thought and jurisprudence Antonin Scalia cast an expansive shadow over the Supreme Court for three decades His unexpected death in February 2016 created a vacancy that precipitated a pitched political fight That battle would not only change the tilt of the court but the course of American history It would help decide a presidential election fundamentally alter longstanding protocols of the United States Senate and transform the Supreme Court which has long held itself as a neutral arbiter above politics into another branch of the federal government riven by partisanship In an unprecedented move the Republican controlled Senate led by majority leader Mitch McConnell refused to give Democratic President Barack Obama s nominee Merrick Garland a confirmation hearing Not one Republican in the Senate would meet with him Scalia s seat would be held open until Donald Trump s nominee Neil M Gorsuch was confirmed in April 2017 Carl Hulse has spent than thirty years covering the machinations of the beltway In Confirmation Bias he tells the story of this history making battle to control the Supreme Court through exclusive interviews with McConnell Harry Reid Chuck Schumer and other top officials Trump campaign operatives court activists and legal scholars as well as never before reported details and developments Richly textured and deeply informative Confirmation Bias provides much needed context revisiting the judicial wars of the past two decades to show how those conflicts have led to our current polarization He examines the politicization of the federal bench and the implications for public confidence in the courts and takes us behind the scenes to explore how many long held democratic norms and entrenched it is also thoroughly depressing because it sheds light on the seemingly intractable dysfunction and rampant hypocrisy on all sides of today s partisan political divide in the US Judicial confirmations are now the most heated and potentially most important battles in the polarizing domestic political struggle between Democrats and Republicans The fundamental question of how our society will interpret the Constitution is at the heart of the partisan divide Both sides have become increasingly willing to burn down traditional processes and rules that have long helped to protect the integrity of our political institutions Actions and words that gain an immediate advantage are planting seeds that are likely to bear bitter fruit in the years to come. Confirmation bias game Beginning with the Supreme Court fights of the 1980s and reaching into recent headlines this book makes clear that both Republicans and Democrats share the blame Robert Bork Clarence Thomas Merrick Garland Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh all feature prominently but I m rounding down because it felt a little partisan and a lot depressing than I expected Good information well researched well written but ultimately very disheartening about the fate of the judiciary 9780062862914 The Senate s increasingly partisan confirmation process for judges and justices has been a key reason that SCOTUS legitimacy has eroded in recent decades Hulse documents this breakdown of Senate comity especially focusing on internal rules changes fueled by partisan rancor that has pretty much broken the confirmation process 9780062862914 Excellent analysis of Democratic and Republican mishandling of appointments to the Supreme Court 9780062862914 .

: Confirmation bias meaning The reader is left to ponder why anyone of high character who values their reputation and that of their family would ever want to enter this cut throat theater of the absurd. Confirmation bias for kids Read with an open mind Set aside the whataboutism that has become so common in today s partisan echo chambers It ll be worth your time 9780062862914 This was a 3