Pro-Life v. Pro-Death: Abortions and the Supreme Court: Roe v. Wade, Doe v. Bolton, Planned Parenthood v. Casey By Catherine McGrew Jaime

Pro-Life v. Pro-Death: Abortions and the Supreme Court: Roe v. Wade, Doe v. Bolton, Planned Parenthood v. Casey By Catherine McGrew Jaime Paperback 1508798427 9781508798422 Historical Fiction Pro Life v. Pro Death: Abortions and the Supreme Court: Roe v. Wade, Doe v. Bolton, Planned Parenthood v. Casey Roe v. Wade, Doe v. Bolton, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey 3 landmark Supreme Court Cases dealing with abortions. Here in one place are important excerpts from all three cases. This book was put together by a conservative lay person for other conservatives. Examples of some of what you will find in the book: The Constitution does not explicitly mention any right of privacy. In a line of decisions, however, going back perhaps as far as 1891, the Court has recognized that a right of personal privacy, or a guarantee of certain areas or zones of privacy, does exist under the Constitution. From Justice Blackmuns Majority Opinion in Roe v. Wade The fact that a majority of the States reflecting, after all, the majority sentiment in those States, have had restrictions on abortions for at least a century is a strong indication, it seems to me, that the asserted right to an abortion is not so rooted in the traditions and conscience of our people as to be ranked as fundamental. From Justice Rehnquists Dissenting Opinion in Roe v. Wade Roe v. Wade sets forth our conclusion that a pregnant woman does not have an absolute constitutional right to an abortion on her demandFurther, a physician or any other employee has the right to refrain, for moral or religious reasons, from participating in the abortion procedure. From Justice Blackmuns Majority Opinion in Doe v. Bolton The common claim before us is that, for any one of such reasons, or for no reason at all, and without asserting or claiming any threat to life or health, any woman is entitled to an abortion at her request if she is able to find a medical advisor willing to undertake the procedure. From Justice Whites Dissent in Doe v. Bolton Viability marks the earliest point at which the States interest in fetal life is constitutionally adequate to justify a legislative ban on nontherapeutic abortions. The soundness or unsoundess of that constitutional judgment in no sense turns on when viability occurs. From the Majority Opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey The correct analysis is that set forth by the plurality opinion in Webster: a womans interest in having an abortion is a form of liberty protected by the Due Process Clause, but States may regulate abortion procedures in ways rationally related to a legitimate state interest. From Rehnquists Minority Opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey

Pro-life v. pro-death historical fiction 2022

Any woman is entitled to an abortion at her request if she is able to find a medical advisor willing to undertake the procedure From Justice White s Dissent in Doe v Bolton Viability marks the earliest point at which the State s interest in fetal life is constitutionally adequate to justify a legislative ban on nontherapeutic abortions The soundness or unsoundess of that constitutional judgment in no sense turns on when viability occurs From the Majority Opinion in Planned Parenthood v Casey The correct analysis is that set forth by the plurality opinion in Webster a woman s interest in having an abortion is a form of liberty protected by the Due Process Clause.

#heading[2]

Historian and World Traveler Former Homeschool Mom of 12 now retired Roe v Wade Doe v Bolton and Planned Parenthood v Casey 3 landmark Supreme Court Cases dealing with abortions Here in one place are important excerpts from all three cases This book was put together by a conservative lay person for other conservatives Examples of some of what you will find in the book The Constitution does not explicitly mention any right of privacy In a line of decisions however going back perhaps as far as 1891 the Court has recognized that a right of personal privacy or a guarantee of certain areas or zones of privacy does exist under the Constitution From Justice Blackmun s Majority Opinion in Roe v Wade The fact that a majority of the States reflecting after all the majority sentiment in those States have had restrictions on abortions for at least a century is a strong indication it seems to me that the asserted right to an abortion is not so rooted in the traditions and conscience of our people as to be ranked as fundamental From Justice Rehnquist s Dissenting Opinion in Roe v Wade Roe v Wade sets forth our conclusion that a pregnant woman does not have an absolute constitutional right to an abortion on her demandFurther a physician or any other employee has the right to refrain for moral or religious reasons from participating in the abortion procedure From Justice Blackmun s Majority Opinion in Doe v Bolton The common claim before us is that for any one of such reasons or for no reason at all and without asserting or claiming any threat to life or health but States may regulate abortion procedures in ways rationally related to a legitimate state interest From Rehnquist s Minority Opinion in Planned Parenthood v Casey Pro Life v Pro Death Abortions and the Supreme Court Roe v Wade Doe v Bolton Planned Parenthood v CaseySometimes in sore need of a distraction I look for errors in Goodreads catalogue Today I found a couple of books which should have been attributed to Catherine McGrew Jaime but were not As is my wont I checked through the rest of her bibliography to see if any editions needed to be merged or separated Sadly the bibliography is alphabetical and I didn t stumble across this red flag until right at the end Librarianship is voluntary and I generally would not tackle books or authors to whom I consider myself significantly morally or politically opposed A cursory look at her website did not disabuse me of this notion in the slightest so this is a placeholder lest I forget I will not engage again 1508798427

Pro-Life v. Pro-Death: Abortions and the Supreme Court: Roe v. Wade, Doe v. Bolton, Planned Parenthood v. Casey By Catherine McGrew Jaime
1508798427
9781508798422
English
138
Paperback
book pro-life v. pro-death book pdf
book pro-life v. pro-death book review
book pro-life v. pro-death death
life cycle books pro life
pro-life v. pro-death book review
pro-life v. pro-death book pdf
pro-life v. pro-death book summary
pro-life v. pro-death book 2
pdf pro-life v. pro-death pdf
pdf pro-life v. pro-death death pdf
pdf pro-life v. pro-death life pdf
pdf pro-life v. pro-death pdf download
pro-life v. pro-death pdf download
pro-life v. pro-death pdf free
pro-life v. pro-death pdf free download
Pro-Life v. Pro-Death: Abortions and the Supreme Court: Roe v. Wade, Doe v. Bolton, Planned Parenthood v. Casey.